BOGOLEX_TOKEN (was: next release [was: ' or ` at TOKENBACK])

[David Relson]

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:22:47 +0100
Boris 'pi' Piwinger <3.14 at logic.univie.ac.at> wrote:

> David Relson wrote:<br>
> 
> >> I am not sure about BOGOLEX_TOKEN, which additional
> >> characters can show up there which may not show up in a
> >> TOKEN? Right now we have: ?=():#+
> > 
> > BOGOLEX_TOKEN is fine as it is.  It's not used in parsing messages. 
> > It exists to recognize messages in msg-count format, as generated by
> > bogolex.sh,   Basically, it needs to accept any token written by
> > "bogoutil -d".
> 
> So AFAICS only : and # might be in such a BOGOLEX_TOKEN, but
> not in a TOKEN. So ?=()+ could go. It won't probably hurt to
> leave them in, though.

'?' is necessary as replace_nonascii_characters cause it to be present. 
The other four are unnecessary, and also harmless.