BOGOLEX_TOKEN

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> wrote:

>> So AFAICS only : and # might be in such a BOGOLEX_TOKEN, but
>> not in a TOKEN. So ?=()+ could go. It won't probably hurt to
>> leave them in, though.
>
>'?' is necessary as replace_nonascii_characters cause it to be present. 
>The other four are unnecessary, and also harmless.

OK; so we have =()+ which are allowed but could not show up,
right?

pi