BOGOLEX_TOKEN (was: next release [was: ' or ` at TOKENBACK])

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

David Relson wrote:<br>

>> I am not sure about BOGOLEX_TOKEN, which additional
>> characters can show up there which may not show up in a
>> TOKEN? Right now we have: ?=():#+
> 
> BOGOLEX_TOKEN is fine as it is.  It's not used in parsing messages.  It
> exists to recognize messages in msg-count format, as generated by
> bogolex.sh,   Basically, it needs to accept any token written by
> "bogoutil -d".

So AFAICS only : and # might be in such a BOGOLEX_TOKEN, but
not in a TOKEN. So ?=()+ could go. It won't probably hurt to
leave them in, though.

pi