religion

[Greg Louis]

On 20030122 (Wed) at 1606:20 +0100, Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
> 
> >> Nevertheless, I think there are sound arguments against what -u does,
> >> except if (1) you use it in binary mode like Boris wants, and (2) you
> >> go in and fix it very frequently with -S and -N as appropriate.
> 
> To make myself clear: I want (1) and do (2) with it.
> 
> >> In binary mode, you enter every message into the training database. 
> >> That's ok.  But you must correct the errors.  If you don't, your
> >> discrimination will deteriorate at an exponentially increasing rate.
> > 
> > OK. So what if -u is still in use and the "unsure" are filed to a
> > special folder and sorted and registered manually?
> 
> You could. But you have to do (2) from above anyway.
> 
Exactly.  Couldn't have put it better myself ;-)

-- 
| G r e g  L o u i s          | gpg public key:      |
|   http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis |   finger greg at bgl.nu |
| Help free our mailboxes. Include                   |
|        http://wecanstopspam.org in your signature. |