religion

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Matthias Andree wrote:

>> Nevertheless, I think there are sound arguments against what -u does,
>> except if (1) you use it in binary mode like Boris wants, and (2) you
>> go in and fix it very frequently with -S and -N as appropriate.

To make myself clear: I want (1) and do (2) with it.

>> In binary mode, you enter every message into the training database. 
>> That's ok.  But you must correct the errors.  If you don't, your
>> discrimination will deteriorate at an exponentially increasing rate.
> 
> OK. So what if -u is still in use and the "unsure" are filed to a
> special folder and sorted and registered manually?

You could. But you have to do (2) from above anyway.

pi