Bogofilter inconsistent spam_subject_tag
Rob Tanner
rtanner+cyrus at linfield.edu
Fri Aug 1 06:51:11 CEST 2003
--On Thursday, July 31, 2003 08:12:35 PM -0400 David Relson
<relson at osagesoftware.com> wrote:
> At 08:04 PM 7/31/03, Rob Tanner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here's a real oddity. Bogofilter is configured to add the subject tag
>> '[SPAM]' to any message it classifies as SPAM. What I have started to
>> notice is that sometimes while it marks the message as SPAM in the
>> X-Bogosity header, it fails to add spam subject tag.
>>
>> Is this a known issue, or if not, any ideas as to where to look to start
>> to debug it?
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Something new! I'd start with "grep spam_subject_tag src/*.c" and see
> where that leads. Enum value RC_SPAM is another indicator for where to
> look.
>
> Can you post the Subject: and X-Bogosity: lines from one of the messages?
>
I'll start with the easiest part first -- some examples:
SUBJECT: Free Vacation and Airfare
X-Bogosity: Yes, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.999887
SUBJECT: Get 12 CDs for the Price of 1
X-Bogosity: Yes, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.000000
I am running bogofilter version 0.13.6.2 on a RedHat 9 system. I am using
smtpprox to sandwhich it between postfix and postfix. I don't have a good
handle on the incidence of the failure, but it's fairly low.
I'll start looking at the source code in the morning.
-- Rob
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/\_\_\_\_\ /\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT,
/\/_/__\/_/ __ /\/_/ /\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR
/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_/ /\/_/
/\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_/ /\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin
\/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound)
Rob Tanner
UNIX Services Manager
Linfield College, McMinnville OR
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list