make rpm
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Thu Dec 29 16:28:52 CET 2005
Matthias,
I've been thinking about the names of our binary rpms. At present we
have:
bogofilter-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - the DB4.2 shared library rpm
bogofilter-static-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - the DB4.2 static linked rpm
recent changes add:
bogofilter-sqlite-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - SQLite3 rpm
I think it would be appropriate to include database version as part of
the binary rpm name, i.e.
bogofilter-db42...
bogofilter-sqlite...
bogofilter-db42-static...
bogofilter-sqlite-static...
A question for you (and the other subscribers to the list) is whether
this is a good naming convention and whether we want/need all these
rpms?
Also, in Makefile.am there's an objdump test? On my workstation it's
triggering the "Please run ..." message. I've checked and my build of
sqlite-3.2.8 _does_ include symbol __ctype_b_loc.
Regards,
David
More information about the bogofilter-dev
mailing list