SA vs BF

[.rp]

> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> 
> > To be fair I've been told that SA is a lot better these days then in the
> > beginning and it can be integrated into a full fledged amavisd-new setup
> > without a lot of hassle. I guss it still requires some tuning now and then
> > which I don't need with bogofilter.
> 
> How about SpamAssassin's Bayes speed? It used to be awkwardly slow...
> 
I don't use SA's Bayes at all.
our setup is that clamav-milter, SA and BF are run on the RH sendmail server.
If it gets through the virus check, hack attempt, phishing and SA then BF is given a shot at it