Bogofilter-0.94.0 - new current release
Eric Wood
eric at interplas.com
Mon Mar 7 04:38:54 CET 2005
Agreed. I'll probably now upgrade to 0.94.0. I have customers running
bogofilter and the thought of having to walk them through recovery of a
transaction db was more frightening than just saying "restore last night's
wordlist.db, and you're done."
I know bogofilter solely based on the info in the FAQ and man page. So if
these two docs are not updated to contain the transactional twist on things,
then I'll just resort to running non-transactional.
Reading recent threads/problems concerning Berkely DB transactions has been
informative but I can't remember them, the FAQ and man page is what make me
feel warm and cozy.
Good work Matthias and David!
-Eric Wood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prof Prlwytzkofski"
> Personally, I think this is a great compromise. Everybody can get what
> he/she wants in an easy way. Backwards compatibility is guaranteed by the
> self-detecting mechanism. Excellent work.
>
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>>The switch to default to non-TXN was made by David without my consent,
>>and we currently diverge on whether transactions should be default or
>>no. I think they should, David is a more concerned about making
>>bogofilter more complex to manage. No big deal, we'll let the users
_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
Bogofilter at bogofilter.org
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list