simplicity vs safety with complexity

[Jef Poskanzer]

>My personal preference in this case is for speed & simplicity.
>I've never had database corruption in 2-3 years of BF use.  And
>I maintain a running ham/spam corpus anyway, so re-training
>from scratch is trivial.  Even if that failed, the worst thing
>that would happen would be that my users get some spam for a
>day or two.  (Actually, it would be good for them! :)  I don't
>view the wordlist as critical data.
>
>-Matt, sticking with 0.92.8 for now

What he said.  Plus, would I still be able to continue distributing
my spamwords database (http://www.acme.com/spamwords/) with the
transactional stuff?
---
Jef

         Jef Poskanzer  jef at acme.com  http://www.acme.com/jef/