New header token tagging

[Matthias Andree]

David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> writes:

> Question 1:  Has anybody else noticed an effect from the new header
> tagging?  If so, what have you noticed?

Yes. Spam detection rate went down big time (read: more false
negatives); I didn't rebuild the data base though. No false positives;
train on error and train on some unsures.

> Question 2: Have y'all a preference for "h:" vs. "head:"?

I prefer "h:".

> Question 3:  Have y'all a preference for what '-H' should do?

I have a preference to drop 2/3rds of all options that we have. :->

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95