breaking the training db

[Peter Bishop]

On 22 Sep 2003 at 20:00, Matthias Andree wrote:

> True spoken, but nobody will care for such cruft code a few months from
> now. Such degeneration or fallback code must be written, debugged,
> integrated, only to be removed a month later, again with debugging,
> de-integration and other tests. That's a lot of work in a beta version.

But on the other hand, it does make transitions more painless for dinosaurs
like me who are well behind the leading edge and do not maintain spam 
archives


-- 
Peter Bishop 
pgb at adelard.com
pgb at csr.city.ac.uk