Understanding tuning results

[Peter Bishop]

On 11 Jun 2003 at 12:53, Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:

> > robs  min_dev spam_cutoff run0 run1 run2 total
> > 1.000 0.475   0.503000     62   66   78  206
> > 0.320 0.475   0.503000     62   66   78  206
> > 0.100 0.475   0.503000     62   66   78  206
> > 0.032 0.475   0.503000     62   66   78  206
> > 0.010 0.475   0.503000     62   66   78  206

As a potential user of tuning.sh, the new format
looks much better than the current one


-- 
Peter Bishop 
pgb at adelard.com
pgb at csr.city.ac.uk