autodaemon [was: mailbox classificataion]

[David Relson]

At 11:23 AM 1/31/03, Fred Yankowski wrote:

>On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:29:23AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > I don't believe that autodaemon will improve the performance when
> > registering big mailboxes, because we'll copy data around, feed it
> > through pipes and sockets which may again imply copying,
>
>I would predict that those potential costs are tiny compared to the
>benefit of not repeatedly loading/storing the database for each
>message.
>
> > and it's less robust.
>
>That seems likely.  But the daemon architecture works fine in
>SpamAssassin, so it's good enough.

I still have a copy of ESR's autodaemon code.  If anyone wants to 
experiment with it, I can post the code.  Es there a volunteer to take on 
the project of integrating it with bogofilter?

David