robinson-fisher - two states vs three states

David Relson relson at osagesoftware.com
Tue Jan 21 14:25:37 CET 2003


At 08:20 AM 1/21/03, Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:

>David Relson wrote:
>
>Thanks for the explanation.
>
> > Second, there are the people that autotrain using the '-u' (update)
> > flag.  If bogofilter isn't sure whether the message is ham or spam, it
> > won't automatically add it to a wordlist.
>
>I use this method and want to avoid this problem, because I
>do the following:
>
> > Third, there are the people who "train on errors".  They check whether
> > bogofilter has correctly classified each message and, for those messages
> > where the person and the program disagree, let the program know about the
> > discrepancy.
>
> > Lastly, for those who really, really don't ever want to see a message
> > classified as "unsure", you can set the value of ham_cutoff to 0 (and
> > bogofilter will only say "Yes" or "No")
>
>I don't find a command line option for this. Is there one?
>It would be nice to have an option which says "use
>spam_cutoff as the value of ham_cutoff". It is great that
>setting it to 0 has that effect.

Hi pi,

You've been quiet for many weeks now.  I hope the new year is going well 
for you.

We don't have a command line option for that - yet.  I've been thinking 
that "-2" and "-3" would work.  If you don't like those choices, let me know.



>pi
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>FAQ: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/bogofilter-faq.html
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: bogofilter-unsubscribe at aotto.com
>For summary digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com
>For more commands, e-mail: bogofilter-help at aotto.com





More information about the Bogofilter mailing list