change in registration options

[Dan Stromberg]

On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 14:51, David Relson wrote:
> At 05:32 PM 2/27/03, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> 
> 
> >My main goal is not to have to tweak my mutt macros and evolution
> >filters, frankly.  Beyond that, I'm not sure I care that much how it's
> >accomplished.
> >
> >But if -S and -N could be left alone, and perhaps -u could unregister
> >spam, and -U could unregister nonspam...
> 
> Dan,
> 
> -u is already used and means update.  If '-u' is specified, after 
> classifying a message as spam, bogofilter will add the words to the spam 
> wordlist.  If the messag is not spam, bogofilter will update the goodlist.

Ah, must have appeared in a more recent version of bogofilter than what
I'm running.

> '-U' has been suggested as a modifier to '-S' and '-N', so '-SU' would 
> unregister spam and '-NU' would unregister ham.

This sounds reasonable, but can it be made getopt without breaking
backward compatibility?

-- 
Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <strombrg at dcs.nac.uci.edu>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.bogofilter.org/pipermail/bogofilter/attachments/20030227/f2d783f2/attachment.sig>