Wierd bogofilter/procmail thing happening

David Relson relson at osagesoftware.com
Wed Apr 16 13:21:02 CEST 2003


Bob,

Spamassassing and bogofilter -u are two methods of automatic 
training.   Both are liable to make classification errors.  They're both 
fine so long as you conscienciously review the results and use "-Sn" and 
"-Ns" to correect errors.

David

At 02:53 AM 4/16/03, Bob Bernstein wrote:

>michael at optusnet.com.au let it be known that:
>
> > The problem is that spamassassin's accuracy isn't that great, and
> > it will wind up adding a bunch of spam as 'good', and a bunch of
> > 'good' things as spam, which will seriously degrade the
> > bogofilter effectiveness.
>
>Oh fer sure; I see that. Here's what I am attempting to get around it:
>
>1. Based on Spamassasin's spam/not-spam decision, use procmail to update
>my wordlists with simple 'bogofilter -s' and 'bogofilter -n' commands.
>
>2. Then, using my wordlists, have bogofilter make its decision as to
>whether the message is spam or not, with 'bogofilter -e -p', and based
>on that result file the message either in my spam folder or other
>message-base folders.
>
>3. Constantly review the contents of my spam folder, and fix all errors
>with 'bogofilter -Sn'. Similarly for any mistakes I find in my
>message-base folders.
>
>At some point, soon I think, I will just take SpamAssassin out of the
>loop, and use my wordlists, only adding a '-u' to the bogofilter
>commandline in #2 above.
>
>Make sense?
>
>
>--
>Bob Bernstein
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>FAQ: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/bogofilter-faq.html
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: bogofilter-unsubscribe at aotto.com
>For summary digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com
>For more commands, e-mail: bogofilter-help at aotto.com





More information about the Bogofilter mailing list