X-Spam-Status (was Re: New Option - '-u' for update)

[David DeSimone]

Ben Rosengart <br at panix.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:51:39PM +0200, Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:
> > 
> > Let's use X-Bogosity:
> > http://tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/bogosity.html
> 
> Seconded.


Instead of "good" and "spam" used to describe mail (adjective vs. noun
conflict, as pointed out earlier), perhaps it should be "good" and
"bogus" (both being adjectives).

Or maybe "excellent"/"bogus".

Just my 1ôÂ,
-- 
 David DeSimone   | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
<fox at rsn.hp.com>  |  that there is no man really clever who has not
 Hewlett-Packard  |  found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson

For summay digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com