X-Spam-Status (was Re: New Option - '-u' for update)
Ben Rosengart
br at panix.com
Fri Oct 4 22:38:17 CEST 2002
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 03:31:01PM -0500, Eric Seppanen wrote:
>
> Where I work we change the header to indicate what machine filtered a
> piece of mail. I could also see users wanting to install bogofilter in a
> way that emulates the behavior of some other filtering system, so in this
> case I do see value in allowing the change.
Good point, but I think that people with such specialized needs
should use formail to rename the headers. That way, only people
who need such a thing will do it. There are too many people out
there who think that because a parameter exists, it should be
customized -- and unfortunately, even such people must be supported
when they report a problem.
I suppose it would be good enough to allow for the customization
with a note in the documentation suggesting that people not change
the default unless they have a good reason. But I still think it
would be bloat.
--
Ben Rosengart (212) 741-4400 x215
Microsoft has argued that open source is bad for business, but you
have to ask, "Whose business? Theirs, or yours?" --Tim O'Reilly
For summay digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list