X-Spam-Status (was Re: New Option - '-u' for update)

[David Relson]

<x-flowed>
At 04:31 PM 10/4/02, Eric Seppanen wrote:


>I agree completely.  I hope every feature request has to pass a gauntlet
>of skepticism before going in.
>
> > If we use sensible header names, no one will ever have any reason to
> > change them.
>
>Where I work we change the header to indicate what machine filtered a
>piece of mail.  I could also see users wanting to install bogofilter in a
>way that emulates the behavior of some other filtering system, so in this
>case I do see value in allowing the change.

Good example of how/why the spam identifier should be user configurable.

I'm looking forward to having your configuration code included in 
bogofilter :-)


>Sensible defaults are still important, though.

Indeed they are.

David


For summay digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe at aotto.com

</x-flowed>