libgmime [was Re: lexer, tokens, and content-types]

[David Relson]

At 07:27 AM 12/11/02, Greg Louis wrote:

>On 20021210 (Tue) at 1412:50 -0500, Scott Lenser wrote:
>
> > > > uuencode
> > >
> > > we don't need that. test will not be uuencoded because it would be
> > > unreadable for netscape then.
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand why we don't need this but I can't find a single
> > spam that is uuencoded so I'll assume you are right.
>
>I can find nonspams that are uuencoded and they make an awful
>mess in the training database.  I haven't looked for uuencoded spams.


Greg,

Have you applied Allyn's patch to lexer.l?  It recognizes the 61 character 
uuencode lines, such as you've encountered, and throws them away.

David