libgmime [was Re: lexer, tokens, and content-types]

[Greg Louis]

On 20021210 (Tue) at 1412:50 -0500, Scott Lenser wrote:

> > > uuencode
> > 
> > we don't need that. test will not be uuencoded because it would be
> > unreadable for netscape then.
> > 
> 
> I don't understand why we don't need this but I can't find a single
> spam that is uuencoded so I'll assume you are right.

I can find nonspams that are uuencoded and they make an awful
mess in the training database.  I haven't looked for uuencoded spams.

-- 
| G r e g  L o u i s          | gpg public key:      |
|   http://www.bgl.nu/~glouis |   finger greg at bgl.nu |