DB backend support for lmdb?

[Matthias Andree]

Am 21.06.2018 um 16:14 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Hello again.
> 
> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20180529185111.0IjYp%steffen at sdaoden.eu>:
>  |Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> wrote:
>  ||Am 28.05.2018 um 23:57 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
>  ...
>  ||> about.  So i think implementing LMDB support will not be a quick
>  ||> shot if done right, i need to read a lot of documentation from
>  ||> LMDB and source code from Bogofilter.  So it may take a little bit
>  ||
>  ||LMDB should be less of a hassle - and on second thought, it might be
>  ||easier to start the implementation off after reading the Berkeley DB
>  ||*and* Kyotocabinet (or Tokyocabinet) implementations to see the simpler
>  ||ones.
>  |
>  |Will do, soon.
>  |
>  ||> longer until i can provide a patch -- nonetheless, i am definetely
>  ||> very interested in LMDB support for bogofilter, if doable, because
>  ||> it is very small (the raw AlpineLinux code package is 90KB,
>  ...
>  ||> and openly maintained.  And Postfix supports LMDB as a replacement
>  ||> for DB out of the box, too.  All this is very desirable to me.
>  ...
>  |I am looking forward for this.
> 
> It has been almost a month and i just want to give the quick info
> that i have not yet managed to come to the idea for my MUA that
> i was talking about, thing by thing sprang into my eyes, also bugs
> have been reported or detected, but i hope i can do that this
> week, so that i _hopefully_ find time to create a LMDB patch for
> bogofilter starting next week.
> I report back when i made it,

Hi Steffen,

I have initial infrastructure support (autotools and dummy files) in
place, but haven't committed it to SVN yet because it's a long shot from
being complete.

Ping me before you want to work on it so that I can send you (or commit
to a branch) what I currently have.

Best regards

-- 
Matthias Andree