DB backend support for lmdb?

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Hello again.

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20180529185111.0IjYp%steffen at sdaoden.eu>:
 |Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> wrote:
 ||Am 28.05.2018 um 23:57 schrieb Steffen Nurpmeso:
 ...
 ||> about.  So i think implementing LMDB support will not be a quick
 ||> shot if done right, i need to read a lot of documentation from
 ||> LMDB and source code from Bogofilter.  So it may take a little bit
 ||
 ||LMDB should be less of a hassle - and on second thought, it might be
 ||easier to start the implementation off after reading the Berkeley DB
 ||*and* Kyotocabinet (or Tokyocabinet) implementations to see the simpler
 ||ones.
 |
 |Will do, soon.
 |
 ||> longer until i can provide a patch -- nonetheless, i am definetely
 ||> very interested in LMDB support for bogofilter, if doable, because
 ||> it is very small (the raw AlpineLinux code package is 90KB,
 ...
 ||> and openly maintained.  And Postfix supports LMDB as a replacement
 ||> for DB out of the box, too.  All this is very desirable to me.
 ...
 |I am looking forward for this.

It has been almost a month and i just want to give the quick info
that i have not yet managed to come to the idea for my MUA that
i was talking about, thing by thing sprang into my eyes, also bugs
have been reported or detected, but i hope i can do that this
week, so that i _hopefully_ find time to create a LMDB patch for
bogofilter starting next week.
I report back when i made it,

Ciao!

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)