0.93 and 1.0

[David Relson]

On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:29:11 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:

> David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 02:00:48 +0200
> > Matthias Andree wrote:
> >
> > ....[snip]...
> >
> >
> >> Observing the whole issue a bit broader, word.[ch] pretty much
> >> resembles the C++ standard library's "string" class. Using that
> >would> save us a lot of hassle, but I'd suggest that C++ is a
> >post-1.0 issue.
> >
> > Speaking of 1.0, what are your thoughts on my proposal to promote
> > the TXN code to HEAD and release 0.93?
> 
> I'd shared your thoughts but hadn't gotten around to fix up the
> documentation and add the missing "auto-resize" code that will kick in
> when bogoutil -d runs out of lock table entries. This is still manual.
> 
> Once these two issues are resolved, we can go 0.93 - and if we have
> the time, let's audit everything so we're no longer using str* stuff
> on word types.

Yeah, it's necessary.  Not fun, but necessary :-<