[long] Recovery handling in TXN branch

[David Relson]

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:47:19 -0400
Gyepi SAM wrote:

...[snip]...

> It seems quite fast. The tokens must, of course, be encoded and
> decoded. I'll keep it in mind for when I have some free cycles to work
> on it. My ultimate goal is to find a fast back-end system that doesn't
> corrupt data and requires *no* user intervention. In my ideal case,
> users wouldn't know or care that bogofilter had a database.

Gyepi,

I agree.  Users will always know that there's a wordlist.  In the ideal
case, they'll not need to know anything about how it's stored.

As soon as I saw SQL, I started thinking about "overhead" (as in
encoding/decoding queries) and performance.  Unfortunately those numbers
won't be know until there's an implementation, i.e. database_sql.c

Sigh :-<

David