[cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
Matthias Andree
matthias.andree at gmx.de
Mon Jan 19 16:03:03 CET 2004
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Stefan Bellon <sbellon at sbellon.de> writes:
>> We'll tie command line options to configuration file options. I wonder
>> if that's desirable. Some options make sense on the command line only
>> (such as the configuration file name). We're exposing all with that
>> single-option approach.
>
> Wasn't it you who wrote two days ago:
>
>> A universal option that allows us to pass any configuration file
>> parameter on the command line might solve that problem for good.
Right, but does that mean we make command line and configuration file
absolutely identical? Some options don't make sense in configuration
files.
--
Matthias Andree
Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the bogofilter-dev
mailing list