[cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
Stefan Bellon
sbellon at sbellon.de
Mon Jan 19 07:04:47 CET 2004
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Stefan Bellon wrote:
[snip]
> > So, why not use '-' as the dedicated option that tells that now a
> > configuration file option follows? The first '-' is the command
> > line switch and the second '-' is your dedicated option. What's
> > wrong with that?
> We'll tie command line options to configuration file options. I wonder
> if that's desirable. Some options make sense on the command line only
> (such as the configuration file name). We're exposing all with that
> single-option approach.
Wasn't it you who wrote two days ago:
> A universal option that allows us to pass any configuration file
> parameter on the command line might solve that problem for good.
--
Stefan Bellon
- Previous message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Next message (by thread): [cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the bogofilter-dev
mailing list