[cvs] bogofilter/src bogoconfig.c,1.136,1.137 configfile.c,1.33,1.34 configfile.h,1.10,1.11

[Stefan Bellon]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, relson at users.sourceforge.net wrote:

[snip]

> > Add '--option=value' to permit config file options on the command
> > line.
> > 
> > +	case '-':
> > +	    process_config_option(optarg, true, PR_COMMAND);
> > +	    break;
> > +

> Is this the right thing to do? I doubt it. I'd think we'd use
> gnugetopt to parse "--option"s and use a dedicated option (yes, yet
> another) to expose configuration file options.

So, why not use '-' as the dedicated option that tells that now a
configuration file option follows? The first '-' is the command line
switch and the second '-' is your dedicated option. What's wrong with
that?

-- 
Stefan Bellon