[bugs]Error in Graham.c line 158

[David Relson]

At 04:57 PM 2/10/03, Matthias Andree wrote:

>Still, we test it. The error message means nothing else than "caught
>buffer overflow attempt" and tells us there is a bug.
>
>It might be one of the infamous "NUL character costs us one byte of our
>buffer" monsters though.

Matthias,

The check was needed in the graham code because the word is copied into the 
extrema array which has fixed size slots for storing the words.  With the 
new word_t code, the fixed slots are gone and there is no need for the 
check.  As as aside, the tokens are all flex outputs and won't have NUL 
bytes in them.

David