UI for correcting mistakes

[elijah]

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Todd Underwood wrote:
> ... SNIP ...
> in either case, you have to tag spam with headers
> and allow clients to filter it into a separate inbox.  as long as you
> tag *all* messages somehow (perhaps simliar to the mailing list
> instruction headers) this method gives the perfect mechanism for
> catching false positives and false negatives.

yeah, i was just thinking that most users do now want the bodies of all
their messages modified to provide the url, but would be happy if the body
of a suspected spam is modified.

-elijah