Floating point errors?

[Ingomar Wesp]

Matthias Andree schrieb:

> Your English is decent enough for a bug report :-)

Well, now I'm feeling abashed ;-)

> Anyways, the alternative action set corresponding to the order you're
> showing above is:
>
> check:    bogofilter -p -e
> SPAM:     bogofilter -s
> NOT SPAM: bogofilter -n

This is exactly what I was to propose. Interestingly, the current set of 
actions resulted from a debate [1] about a change in bogofilter's options 
back in 2004. The people, who were involved back then, realised the fact that 
using the "unregister"-options together with unclassified messages might be 
problematic, but did so nonetheless. Maybe they were not entirely sure about 
the severity of the possible consequences.

> It would also speed things up a bit as the "check" no longer involves
> costly synchronous writes and keep the database size smaller.

I realized that. It makes a quite a big difference on my system.

[1] <http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74577>