bogoutil question
R Kimber
rkimber at ntlworld.com
Tue Jan 30 21:36:22 CET 2007
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 19:22:26 +0100
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Why? See, "bogoutil --db-verify foo.db" does the following:
>
> 1. lock the database for exclusive access
> 2. attempt recovery
> 3. only then verify consistency.
> db_verify, in contrast, only does part of the work, namely step #3, so
> it may report inconsistencies that are temporary if it is running
> while bogofilter or bogoutil are modifying the database (which it does
> not lock), and it may also report inconsistencies of transactionally
> operated databases that are repairable, and that other bogo* programs
> can and will automatically and transparently (i. e. they're not
> telling you) repair (since db_verify does not attempt repair).
I see that, but why would I get different results with the two commands
on a db that is not being used by bogoflter at all. I.e on an archive
copy elsewhere on the system that cannot be accessed by bogofilter?
Thanks for being patient :)
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list