bogoutil question

[Matthias Andree]

R Kimber <rkimber at ntlworld.com> writes:

> On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:24:46 +0100
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Eric Wood wrote:
>> 
>> > bogoutil must be broke....
>> 
>> Indeed, the database adaptor for traditional (non-transactional)
>> Berkeley DB databases never invoked the db_verify method.
>> 
>> The one for transactional databases did however.
>> 
>> I've fixed the bug in CVS, the fix will appear in the next bogofilter
>> release.
>
> I'm glad we've finally got to the bottom of it.

And I'm still wondering if we shouldn't just ditch the nontransactional
Berkeley DB mode. I'd think transactional mode should take care of many
database problems.

-- 
Matthias Andree