Spam in images

Nigel Henry cave.dnb at tiscali.fr
Wed Sep 6 17:32:28 CEST 2006


On Wednesday 06 September 2006 16:51, Eric Wood wrote:
> From: "Tom Anderson"
>
> > Your assumption that, "Legit corporate email grabs all the images from
> > the web", is false.  I have received more and more email with inline
> > pictures.
>
> Examples?
>
> > I usually advise sending multipart emails with
> > both text and html portions, but some companies prefer only to create an
> > html version and many customers don't set their email client to display
> > text emails first... they set it to display html emails, but keep the
> > images off.
>
> I go around to many companies to work on their systems and I have yet to
> meet a person that turned images off because they were concerned about
> privacy.  Average users don't play on/off games with their email client,
> they just want to see the email whereever it comes from and go home at 5:00
> o'clock.
>
> > So, the only recourse is for businesses to start including
> > graphics in their emails if they hope to communicate their message
> > before it gets deleted.  Thus, putting bounds on the size of the email
> > or identifying inline images will become less and less effective as a
> > spam prevention measure.
>
> Seems like a bunch of people disagree with your recomendation:
> Tigerdirect, Surplus Computers, BellSouth, Ebay, Office Depot/Max,
> Techmags, Paypal and many other html emails I just scrolled through in my
> inbox all reference (pull) images from their corporate webservers.   There
> may be one oddball company sending me some inline images in there
> somewhere.....  And like I said, it's usually people inlining their
> signature pictures or corporate logos that could be a future problem if
> their email client does "cids:" with a @. notion.
>
> > I don't see that this class of spams is  particularly effective.
>
> Nor do I.
>
> > Nor do they warrant any special treatment.  Just train on errors.
>
> Ahem.... but you are doing special treatment!  You had to run it through a
> perl fork (stripsearch).
>
> I'm just saying my "special treatment" is to look at cid: syntax and yours
> it to grab an ASN and train on that.  I'm just not that advanced yet.
>
> -eric wood
> PS.  My procmail rule caught 19 images spam while writing this message.


Interesting. Bogofilter has just classified your reply as an unsure, but not 
the earlier replies.

Nigel.



More information about the Bogofilter mailing list