image-only spam -- ideas, what to do?
John Villalovos
sodarock at gmail.com
Thu Dec 14 04:53:14 CET 2006
On 12/12/06, Tom Anderson <tanderso at oac-design.com> wrote:
> John Villalovos wrote:
> > I add this to my /etc/procmailrc. It adds a header if there is an inline image.
> >
> > :0 HB
> > # If it has an inline image, put in a header to indicate so.
> > * src=(3D)?\"cid:.*@.*\"
> > {
> > :0 fwh
> > # Make sure space at end of header.
> > | formail -I"X-Inline-Image: "
> > }
>
> I'm not sure that's even necessary. Bogofilter already scores "src",
> "mime:image", "mime:Content-ID", "baseline", "mime:gif", "head:related",
> and other inline-image-related tokens. It certainly can't hurt to add
> one more though.
You are probably correct, looking at a message that ended up in my
unsure folder:
"src" 6133 0.240113 0.480200 0.666647 -
"head:related" 2309 0.078569 0.194878 0.712650 -
"mime:image" 1640 0.019196 0.182011 0.904542 +
"mime:Content-ID" 1606 0.016469 0.181012 0.916550 +
"mime:gif" 1505 0.015315 0.169769 0.917195 +
"baseline" 608 0.001259 0.074453 0.983212 +
"head:X-Inline-Image" 476 0.000839 0.058463 0.985641 +
So I'm not sure that my additional header is really making a big
difference or not.
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list