Spam in images

[Pavel Kankovsky]

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Tom Anderson wrote:

> > What I'm suggesting is that whether a zero-word message is classified
> > as ham or spam should be under the control of the user, via an option
> > on the command line. The default, to enable backwards compatibility,
> > should be ham,
> 
> That's simply not true.  All emails have dozens of tokens in the header 
> on which to filter.  Having no body text is indicative of nothing.

Moreover, the score of an (artificial) empty message--or any message
containing no known tokens--is equal to robx, therefore it is "under
the control of the user". :)

$ bogofilter -m,,.123456 -t < /dev/null
U 0.123456

--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak  [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."