Does BF use binary iconv binary during normal operation?
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Thu Jun 23 21:16:05 CEST 2005
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Uwe Richter wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> having configured BF V0.95.0 on Tru64 with --enable-iconv and
> --enable-unicode along with --prefix=.../sendmail-addons/usr/local (where
> it's own libiconv, gettext and DB libs and binaries are placed) a
> "make check" did well only with
> _RLD_LIST=.../sendmail-addons/usr/local/lib/libiconv_plug.so:DEFAULT and
> preferring the GNU iconv over the Tru64 original.
> For converting the DB to UTF-8 i can use iconv interactively, too.
> These are no problems to me.
>
> But i'm a little bit unsure whether bogofilter (used as delivery agent via
> procmail) expects libiconv_plug.so put in with _RLD_LIST and/or uses the
> iconv binary in normal
> operations. So ...
>
> Does the bogofilter use the (GNU) iconv during "make check" only and will
> the binary happy with a configure/make described above?
>
> With best regards
> Uwe
H'lo Uwe,
I don't know Tru64, hence can't say whether libiconv_plug.so will be
used. My bet is that it is present for sendmail. Since bogofilter
normally gets iconv() from glibc(), I expect it to work similarly under
Tru64.
For sure, since you have bogofilter built, you can run it from the
command line and see whether libiconv_plug.so is loaded. My bet is
that it won't be needed.
HTH,
David
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list