Does BF use binary iconv binary during normal operation?

David Relson relson at osagesoftware.com
Thu Jun 23 21:16:05 CEST 2005


On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Uwe Richter wrote:

> 
> Hello all,
> 
> having configured BF V0.95.0 on Tru64 with --enable-iconv and 
> --enable-unicode along with --prefix=.../sendmail-addons/usr/local (where 
> it's own libiconv, gettext and DB libs and binaries are placed) a
> "make check" did well only with 
> _RLD_LIST=.../sendmail-addons/usr/local/lib/libiconv_plug.so:DEFAULT and 
> preferring the GNU iconv over the Tru64 original.
> For converting the DB to UTF-8 i can use iconv interactively, too.
> These are no problems to me.
> 
> But i'm a little bit unsure whether bogofilter (used as delivery agent via 
> procmail) expects libiconv_plug.so put in with _RLD_LIST and/or uses the 
> iconv binary in normal
> operations. So ...
> 
> Does the bogofilter use the (GNU) iconv during "make check" only and will 
> the binary happy with a configure/make described above?
> 
> With best regards
> Uwe

H'lo Uwe,

I don't know Tru64, hence can't say whether libiconv_plug.so will be
used.  My bet is that it is present for sendmail.  Since bogofilter
normally gets iconv() from glibc(), I expect it to work similarly under
Tru64.

For sure, since you have bogofilter built, you can run it from the
command line and see whether libiconv_plug.so is loaded.  My bet is
that it won't be needed.

HTH,

David




More information about the Bogofilter mailing list