Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> writes: >> It looks like there's an 0xE0 character in that position. > > 0xe0 in iso-8859-1[5] but 0xc3 0xa0 in UTF-8. And 0xa0 might be mapped > to 0x20 by some of the charset conversion routines that 0.92.X had, or > might trigger ...a bug in libc. -- Matthias Andree