bogotune

[Tom Allison]

Tom Allison wrote:
> Interesting results.  While it did complain that I had one ham that 
> scored 1.00 (it's not spam, really) it came up with a questionable 
> result for spam_cutoff / ham_cutoff
> 
> Recommendations:
> 
> ---cut---
> db_cachesize=3
> robs=0.0100
> min_dev=0.394
> robx=0.399395
> sp_esf=0.056314
> ns_esf=0.205512
> spam_cutoff=0.002532    # for 0.10% fp (1); expect 0.44% fn (9).
> #spam_cutoff=0.000451   # for 0.20% fp (3); expect 0.29% fn (6).
> ham_cutoff=0.100
> ---cut---
> 
> Tuning completed.
> _______________________________________________
> Bogofilter mailing list
> Bogofilter at bogofilter.org
> http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter
> 

On a related note.  I haven't used the ESF settings before.

I am assuming that I don't need to do any retraining/rebuilding of 
database to impliment these?