0.92.6's bogotune much slower?
Valient Gough
vgough at pobox.com
Wed Sep 1 14:25:42 CEST 2004
Summary: bogotune has had 28 hours of cpu time so far on a 1.7Ghz
machine, taking 120Mb of memory (no swapping). The process is CPU bound
and only looks to be about half finished.
First, let me say thanks for bogofilter - I've been using it for a long
time and it has been great.
I just upgraded from 0.92.0 to 0.92.6 and am seeing performance problems
with bogotune. I have a couple thousand ham message and approx 22
thousand spam messages in maildir folders (10:1 spam:ham is why I'm glad
to have the combination of bogofilter and spamassassin for email).
The wordlist file is 35Mb in size. I've set the db_cachesize to 32Mb,
but that doesn't seem to have had any effect.
I ran bogotune under 0.92.0 to get my current settings a few months ago,
and that took on the order of 2 hours for the run. I decided to run
again since I have a few thousand more messages to try and optimize
against.
Has bogotune become much slower in recent releases? Is there anything I
can do to make it faster?
regards,
Valient Gough
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.bogofilter.org/pipermail/bogofilter/attachments/20040901/c8b974cd/attachment.html>
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list