Safe to use bogofilter over NFS?

[David Relson]

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:40:24 -0600
Bill McClain wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:15:38 +0100
> Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> > I might vote for dropping the -u option though.
> 
> Oh, no, don't do that. With thresh_update I find the feature valuable.
> Less than 10% of my spam gets registered and I compact the worldlist
> once a month at most.
> 
> Transactions: I've been happy without them, but I'm just a single-user
> home office. I'll stick with transactionless 0.92.8 until issues with
> the newer versions have settled down.
> 
> -Bill

Hi Bill,

'-u' and thresh_update are _not_ going away.  Reason:  I use them and
value them.

Changes to bogofilter are presently focused on transactions.  0.92.8 is
a safe place to be, the only known bug is that certain malformed encoded
RFC-2047 Subject lines can cause it to crash.  I can post the 1-line
patch if you'd like.

David