bogotune results

[Tom Allison]

Boris 'pi' Piwinger wrote:
> 
> 
> Right. OTOH you can see any unsure as a failure.
> 

I would think any Unsure to be a failure is a little over expectant.

If my assumption of what bogotune does is correct, I would have assumed 
a ham_cutoff just above the highest scoring ham and a spam_cutoff just 
below the lowest scoring spam.

However, I do not understand the min_dev/robx/robs contribution to 
filtering well enough to comment on them in regard to the numbers that 
bogotune might suggest.