headers - example

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Jozef Hitzinger <hitzinger at phobos.fphil.uniba.sk> wrote:

>> If a message was "pure spam" that's how bogofilter would classify it.
>> Your message included messages that you've used in ham training, else
>> bogofilter wouldn't classify them as ham.  Sounds like additional
>> training is needed.  Bogofilter needs sufficient information to to a
>> good job, and that doesn't happen overnight.
>
>Again .. I've trained on full messages, i.e. with headers. Aditional
>training would not do any good, 

If you refuse to let bogofilter learn, then live with it.

>because I constantly get more ham than
>spam from there.

So what? It will change the weight to something more
appropriate.

>I'm trying to tell you all, that bogofilter can do _better_, if we drop
>the headers (except Subject), on both training and filtering. 

And you presented *no* evidence at all.

pi