bogus bogotuning

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Peter Bishop wrote:

> Why not get some more spam then everybody will be happy!!
> 
> Have a look at spamarchive.org
> You will find plenty there to get you to the 2000 limit.

Bad idea. Your spam is not my spam. Headers will look
totally different, for example.

> Another alternative is to use "bogominitrain"
> which leaves the parameters fixed, but is selective about what hams 
> and spam are added to to the database maximise detection performance. 

And it seems unnedded to tune.

> From the tests it appears to perform well on small numbers of email 
> messages and does not need a large corpus.

Good to know. I did not test that myself.

pi