16.2 not as effective
David Relson
relson at osagesoftware.com
Mon Jan 26 03:26:39 CET 2004
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 01:13:44 -0000 (GMT)
Andrew Norman wrote:
...[snip]...
> Thankfully I archive _all_ my spam and ham, so I have plenty of
> training material...
>
> I've been putting off upgrading to a recent version for a while now,
> because I know it will take me half a day or more to implement it.
When you switch over, the easiest thing is to create a totally new
wordlist using your accumulated ham and spam. Something like:
bogofilter -d . -s -M -B spam*.mbx
bogofilter -d . -n -M -B ham*.mbx
mv ./wordlist.db /your/bogofilter/dir/
is all you need from "build from scratch".
> > P.S. 0.16.4 (current) is at least as good as 0.15.13 (stable).
> > There have been changes to the supporting programs, but nothing of
> > significance to the bogofilter binary itself. The newer version
> > will also more closely match the code in the next release series
> > (0.17.x). I'd recommend using 0.16.4 :-)
>
> Great, whether or no I should jump to 0.16.x was a question I was just
> about to ask ;-)
Version 0.17.0 is "Code Clean-up Release - Phase 2". All the code that
was deprecated in 0.16.0 is being removed. The overall goal is a code
clean-up so that version 1.0 is a solid platform for bogofilter's
future.
Details of the changes for 0.16.0 are in file RELEASE.NOTES-0.16. It's
recommended reading for anybody upgrading bogofilter from an old version
or who's not using bogofilter's default options.
Cheers!
David
More information about the Bogofilter
mailing list