gcc-2.7.2.1

[Stefan Bellon]

Matthias Andree wrote:
> Stefan Bellon <sbellon at sbellon.de> writes:

> > But they still don't exactly adhere to the standard AFAICT.

> They still leave local extensions that start with double underscore
> enabled. How much influence the standard headers have is another
> matter in the default -fhosted mode...

Does this piece of code compile in GCC's strict C90 or C99 mode?

        void f(char c, signed char sc, unsigned char uc)
        {
          char* pc = &uc;
          signed char* psc = pc;
          unsigned char* puc = pc;
          psc = puc;
        }

-- 
Stefan Bellon