the importance of robx

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

David Relson <relson at osagesoftware.com> wrote:

>What prompted this thread was noticing that with robs, min_dev, and fn
>held constant changing robx yields a different spam_cutoff (as expected)
>and yield a different false positive count (also expected).  The
>surprise was how much the fp count changed.  

I meant to say that this effect will only happen for larger
robs. If that was very small, robx won't have any influence
as long as it is inside the min_dev interval. It also won't
affect hapaxes.

pi