quick-n-dirty parameter tuning, was Re: compile time options

[Boris 'pi' Piwinger]

Greg Louis <glouis at dynamicro.on.ca> wrote:

>> It's of course important to take account of the overhead of the tune
>> operation, but balance that with the overhead of improperly classifying
>> email and needing to correct it.  The more you tune, in the end, the
>> less you'll actually have to tune, right?
>> 
>Certainly!

So a cronjob sounds pretty reasonable. You just need to
collect your ham and spam, but that's needed either way.

pi