interesting spammer tricks

David Relson relson at osagesoftware.com
Wed Sep 24 13:36:26 CEST 2003


On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:33:48 +0200
Przemyslaw Brojewski <przemek at my.tenbit.pl> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:25:12PM -0400, David Relson wrote:
> > Tom,
> > 
> > I'm not sure exactly how good a foiler your message is.  The scoring
> > results using _my_ wordlists are given below.  Of interest is that
> > using my min_dev, robs, robx, etc the message parses with 11 hammish
> > tokens and 16 spammish tokens, which puts the message squarely in
> > the "Unsure" category (at 0.500000).  After using this message for
> > spam training (and then rescoring it), the score goes to Spam
> > 1.01e-5 (which means the score is 1.000000 - 1.01e-5, which is
> > 0.999995 or so).
> > 
> > Once again, a spam trick that works the first time.  After training
> > on the trick, bogofilter will nail it to the wall!!!
> > 
> > Time for a new, different spammer trick!
> > 
> It would be nice, if we could se how much scoring changed for
> other messages in training corpus. Just for completness.
> 
> Przemek.

An interesting idea...  I suspect most other messages aren't affected
since their tokens are different.  If you're feeling ambitious, why
don't you run an experiment and report back.

David




More information about the Bogofilter mailing list